King Pharma king Pharma sells 'laboratory-grade peptide compounds' for research use and, unusually, publishes an open COA library of genuine Janoshik Analytical reports (one, for CJC-1295, verifies as Janoshik test 74431). However, those certificates carry no client name, the sample-submitted-by field is blank, and King Pharma's own page states products are 'independently tested and verified by Singapore Hengtai Industrial Co', its manufacturer. A verifiable Janoshik report with no client name is the factory's batch test displayed by the reseller, not a certificate commissioned in King Pharma's own name, so it does not establish that a given vial you receive matches that batch.
| Fact | What we found | How it was checked |
|---|---|---|
| Standard applied | own-name verifiable-COA standard | how every vendor is judged, methodology |
| Certificate | nothing we could verify in this seller's own name, details below | read on the seller's own site |
| This audit as data | /data/vendor/kingpharma-co-uk.json | same record the open dataset serves, re-checked daily |
The Peptide Watch benchmarks every vendor on the same compound, BPC-157, the most common research peptide, as £ per milligram, so prices are directly comparable across all providers. No public BPC-157 price feed was available for this vendor at audit.
King Pharma (kingpharma.co.uk) is on The Peptide Watch's watch list. It does not publish a certificate of analysis that can be independently verified in its own name, so its quality claims rest on trust rather than checkable evidence. That is not proof of a scam; it means the evidence does not check out.
You cannot independently verify its testing today. A good delivery reputation is not the same as a verifiable certificate; the two are unrelated. Until King Pharma publishes an own-name certificate you can check on an independent lab's website, you are taking its quality on trust.
The Peptide Watch does not assert that. What is observable is the reason it sits on the watch list: shows a supplier's certificate, not its own. Being unverifiable is a reason for caution, not proof of fraud.
Not one that can be independently verified in its own name. ⚠ Real Janoshik reports, but no client name on them. King Pharma publishes a COA library of genuine Janoshik reports, but the certificates carry no client name and the site says testing is by its manufacturer, so the rep