Pendragonpeptides states its peptides are 'third-party tested' / 'lab tested' to ≥99% but never names the lab and publishes no verifiable certificate. A purity claim with no lab, no document and no verification link is just a number on a product page, the buyer is asked to take quality entirely on trust.
Quoted straight from pendragonpeptides.com, and why it falls apart.
| BPC-157 | £11.5/mg (≈ £115 for a 10 mg vial) |
| Versus market median (£3.0/mg) | 3.8×, very expensive |
Far above the market average. The Peptide Watch benchmarks every vendor on the same compound, BPC-157, the most common research peptide, as £ per milligram, so prices are directly comparable across all providers.
| Check | Result |
|---|---|
| Verifiable certificate in its own name | No |
| Independent lab named | None named / unverifiable |
| Tests its own stock | No evidence |
| Pricing vs market | 3.8× median (very expensive) |
| Claims that don't add up | 1 found |