Is Raccoonpeptides legit?
Raccoonpeptides shows a genuine Janoshik report to look legitimate, but the client named on that certificate is Uther Peptide, not Raccoonpeptides. In other words it has never paid to test its own stock; it has taken a certificate that proves a sample from its supplier's own line, and presents it as proof of what's in the vial it ships. The buyer is shown real-looking science that is, for their purposes, meaningless, there is no link between that certificate and the product they receive. Aggravating: runs contact/orders through WhatsApp.
"Shopping around" between these names is buying from one seller, same stock, same risk, different branding.
The certificate, and what's wrong with it
Pricing vs the market, benchmarked on BPC-157
The Peptide Watch benchmarks every vendor on the same compound, BPC-157, the most common research peptide, as £ per milligram, so prices are directly comparable across all providers. No public BPC-157 price feed was available for this vendor at audit.
Reviews
Read it critically. A Trustpilot score measures whether parcels turn up and support replies, not whether the vial contains what the label says. A vendor can have hundreds of happy delivery reviews and still show you a borrowed or fake certificate; the two are unrelated. Also watch for a burst of near-identical 5-star reviews in a short window, the signature of bought reviews.
Read Raccoonpeptides on Trustpilot →
Who runs it
| Same operator as | anglopeptides.co.uk · anglopeptides.com · raccoonpeptides.co.uk, registered to the same address, 195-197 Wood Street, London E17 |
The audit checklist
| Check | Result |
|---|---|
| Verifiable certificate in its own name | No |
| Independent lab named | Janoshik, but borrowed |
| Tests its own stock | No evidence |
| Customer reviews (Trustpilot) | 4.8★ (73 reviews) |
| Operates under one brand | No, shared operator |