🚩 On the watch list, its certificate can't be verified in its own name.
Vionexpeptides claims an 'accredited' or 'UKAS-verified UK laboratory' but never names it. Accreditation you can't attribute to a named body is unfalsifiable, the word 'accredited' is doing PR work with nothing checkable behind it. (Note: Janoshik isn't even UK-based, so 'UK lab' is a tell it isn't them.)
The certificate, and what's wrong with it
🟦 other named lab
What this certificate actually is: A certificate displayed by the seller, read it against the teardown above; it is not a verifiable independent test in the seller's own name., client field: Vionex Peptides
⏳ This certificate is dated Feb 2024, about 2 years old. A certificate from Feb 2024 cannot describe anything this seller would ship you today, that batch is long gone. Showing a about 2 years old certificate for a product on sale now is meaningless; the stock you'd actually receive is untested.
Pricing vs the market, benchmarked on BPC-157
The Peptide Watch benchmarks every vendor on the same compound, BPC-157, the most common research peptide, as £ per milligram, so prices are directly comparable across all providers. No public BPC-157 price feed was available for this vendor at audit.
Reviews
Has a Trustpilot page, with zero reviews on it. A storefront set up to look established, with nobody actually vouching for it.
Read it critically. A Trustpilot score measures whether parcels turn up and support replies, not whether the vial contains what the label says. A vendor can have hundreds of happy delivery reviews and still show you a borrowed or fake certificate; the two are unrelated. Also watch for a burst of near-identical 5-star reviews in a short window, the signature of bought reviews.
The bottom line. Vionexpeptides sits on the watch list because it does not publish a certificate that can be verified in its own name. Everything above is observable on its own website and the public record. See the vendors whose certificates are actually their own →
⚠️ Is anything on this page wrong or out of date? Submit a correction request and we'll look into it, vendors welcome too.